bitcoin-dev
BIP proposal: Generalized version bits voting (bip-genvbvoting)
Original Postby Thomas Kerin
Posted on: April 5, 2017 14:09 UTC
Miners are irrelevant when it comes to hardforks as they cannot make the process any smoother.
While BIP9 can indicate censorship in a soft fork, a hard fork always requires nodes to upgrade to the version increasing the degrees of freedom of the system. Signaling is less useful here since the change is not opt-in and will require coordination, and the continuation of the chain thereafter depends on people actually running the hard-fork code, not just being aware there is something happening. Miners became a convenient way to activate soft-forks but they can't ameliorate a HF transition in the way they can censor transactions without permission.